Pauline Plagnat

Walk-transect

Pauline Plagnat

Ian Florin, Martin Shaeffler

Engage
All projects
Rendre actifs
Project

This interdisciplinary workshop in environmental science encourages students to conduct field observation and collaborate in groups to solve environmental problems, integrating their disciplinary knowledge and making a final oral presentation with constructive peer feedback.

Since:2017
Back to the catalogue

Initial situation

Environmental sciences are a scientific field where a problem must be understood in a global way. The viewpoint of experts from various disciplines is therefore essential for a good understanding of the issues and related themes. This is why, in this workshop, students are encouraged to initiate an interdisciplinary dialogue within the framework of a problem-solving and project-based approach.

Project implementation

The main purpose of the workshop is to carry out an interdisciplinary project through a field observation called “walk-transect”. Each student will explore a place by taking on a defined role with a specific disciplinary vision. Then, the students work in groups to pool the different points of interest they have identified.

During the first sessions, the teacher provides the theoretical tools concerning the epistemological and methodological aspects of interdisciplinarity. Students are also introduced to the principles and tools of teamwork, as well as the basics of oral communication and constructive feedback. Students have the opportunity to reflect on interdisciplinarity and their own contribution to it, if they wish.

During the following sessions, a general theme is given (e.g., the tree in the city). During a brainstorming session, the students assess their academic skills on the theme. Because of the diversity of their background (biology, politics, geography, medicine, linguistics, etc.), the skills are very diverse. The students’ personal generic skills are also taken into account (creativity, knowledge of the city, conducting interviews, etc.). The students are then grouped by skills and divided into working groups of 5 to 6 students. The objective is for the students to understand the interest of these different skills and how they can be articulated within a group.

Each group is then assigned a section of the route predefined by the teacher. Each member of the group then practices the “walk-transect” alone, collecting data according to the role he or she has been assigned in relation to his or her own skills, before sharing his or her observations with his or her classmates. Following this walk, the group begins to pool the different disciplinary perspectives brought by each person. Then, each group determines the problem on which it will focus and the solutions to be brought. On the last day, the group presents their project orally to the other groups, who provide constructive feedback (peer feedback using an evaluation grid).

The evaluation consists of an individual reflective work on the group project (a synthesis of 800 words), the constructive feedback given by the peers, a reflection on this feedback as well as an analytical reflection on the interdisciplinary work argued and including bibliographical references.

Thoughts and advice

The teacher emphasized the importance of framing discussions about skills and helping students define them. Students must be able to be very reflective about their own discipline and to differentiate between skills and tools.

It is important to value peer feedback, as some students tend to discount it in favor of teacher feedback, which can be very time consuming.

Student feedback

“This workshop taught us to understand and know each other better, to perceive our own limits and those of others. Because of the formation of the groups by the teachers, we had no choice but to comply with this decision and to work together, to find a compromise, which was a great experience. Because this work was not only interdisciplinary through the different subjects brought together, but also in its very essence, through the confrontation of different characters and personalities ” “This is a very appropriate workshop to start this Master’s degree. It allows us to become aware of the disciplines we will be working with. The practical side is appreciable: a purely theoretical presentation of interdisciplinarity would quickly become boring and remain abstract. The social cohesion that the workshop allows for among the students is particularly appreciable.